HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Methods supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leung, C. C. Articles by Tsui, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leung, C. C. Articles by Tsui, D.

Comparison of T-Spot.TB and tuberculin skin test among silicotic patients

¹ Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Centre for Health Protection, Dept of Health, ² Dept of Microbiology and Centre of Infection, University of Hong Kong, and ³ Tuberculosis and Chest Unit, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

CORRESPONDENCE: C. C. Leung, Pneumoconiosis Clinic, 4/F, 8 Chai Wan Road, Shaukeiwan, Hong Kong, China. Fax: 86 85229775940. E-mail: cc_leung{at}dh.gov.hk

Keywords: Latent tuberculosis infection, silicosis, smoking

Received: May 7, 2007
Accepted October 12, 2007

In the present study, T-Spot.TB and the tuberculin skin test (TST) were compared in the screening of latent tuberculosis infection among silicotic patients.

A conditional probability model was used to compare the potential clinical utilities of T-Spot.TB and TST performed on 134 silicotic subjects from December 1, 2004 to January 31, 2007. Data from a historical cohort were also reanalysed for further comparison.

Agreement with T-Spot.TB was best using a TST cut-off of 10 mm. Age 65 yrs independently predicted a tuberculin reaction <10 mm (odds ratio = 3), but not a negative T-Spot.TB response. Lower measures of agreement were observed among current smokers and those aged 65 yrs. Tuberculin reaction size was well correlated with both early secretary antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10 spot counts, except among current smokers. Within the current estimates of sensitivity (88–95%) and specificity (86–99%) for T-Spot.TB, the positive likelihood ratio for T-Spot.TB test would be substantially higher (6.29–95.0 versus 1.65–1.94) and negative likelihood ratio substantially lower (0.05–0.14 versus 0.32–0.41) than the corresponding ratios for the tuberculin test. A low tuberculosis risk differential was similarly observed between tuberculin-negative and untreated tuberculin-positive subjects in the historical cohort.

T-Spot.TB is likely to perform better than tuberculin test in the screening of latent tuberculosis infection among silicotic subjects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Leung, T. H. Lam, W. M. Chan, W. W. Yew, K. S. Ho, G. M. Leung, W. S. Law, C. M. Tam, C. K. Chan, and K. C. Chang Diabetic Control and Risk of Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2008; 167(12): 1486 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Leung, W. C. Bailey, and W. W. Yew Screening Contacts of Tuberculosis: Overcoming Obstacles with an Old Tool Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2008; 177(9): 939 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF]