HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Patient questionnaire Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chapman, K. R. Articles by Franssen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chapman, K. R. Articles by Franssen, E.

Suboptimal asthma control: prevalence, detection and consequences in general practice

¹ University of Toronto, Toronto, ² Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, and ³ GlaxoSmithKline Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

CORRESPONDENCE: K. R. Chapman, Asthma and Airway Centre, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Room 7E-451, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada. Fax: 1 4166033456. E-mail: kchapman{at}ca.inter.net

Keywords: Guideline dissemination, healthcare utilisation

Received: August 3, 2007
Accepted October 11, 2007

Telephone surveys describing suboptimal asthma control may be biased by low response rates.

In order to obtain an unbiased assessment of asthma control and assess its impact in primary care, primary care physicians used a 1-page control questionnaire in 50 consecutive asthma patients.

Of the 10,428 patients assessed by 354 physicians, 59% were uncontrolled, 19% well-controlled and 23% totally controlled. Physicians overestimated control, regarding only 42% of patients as uncontrolled. Physicians were more likely to report plans to alter the regimens of uncontrolled patients than controlled patients (1.29 versus 0.20 medication changes per patient) doing so in a fashion consistent with guideline recommendations. Of the uncontrolled patients, 59% required one or more urgent care or specialist visits versus 26 and 15% of well-controlled or totally controlled patients, respectively. Patients were more likely to report short-term symptom control when they had not required urgent or specialist care (odds ratio 5.68; 95% confidence interval 4.91–6.58).

The majority of asthma patients treated in general practice are uncontrolled. Lack of control can be recognised by physicians who are likely to consider appropriate changes to therapy. A lack of short-term symptom control of asthma is associated with excess healthcare utilisation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Stanbrook MD PhD and A. Kaplan MD The error of not measuring asthma Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 18, 2008; 179(11): 1099 - 1100. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Stanbrook MD PhD and A. Kaplan MD Ne pas evaluer l'asthme : une erreur Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 18, 2008; 179(11): 1101 - 1102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Lindmark Review: Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 279 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Chapman MD MSc Asthma in Canada: missing the treatment targets Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 8, 2008; 178(8): 1027 - 1028. [Full Text] [PDF]