ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 11, 2008, 10.1183/09031936.00140507
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/637    most recent
09031936.00140507v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puhan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schünemann, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puhan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schünemann, H. J.
Eur Respir J 2008; 32:637-643
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2008

Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD

M. A. Puhan1, M. J. Mador2, U. Held1, R. Goldstein3, G. H. Guyatt4 and H. J. Schünemann4,5

1 Horten Centre, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2 Dept of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA, 3 West Park Healthcare Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, 4 Dept of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, and 5 Dept of Epidemiology, Italian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.

CORRESPONDENCE: M. A. Puhan, Horten Centre, University Hospital of Zurich, Postfach Nord, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. Fax: 41 12559720. E-mail: milo.puhan{at}usz.ch

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise test, interpretation, randomised trials, 6-min walk distance

Received: October 24, 2007
Accepted May 19, 2008

There is uncertainty about the interpretation of changes in the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and whether the minimal important difference (MID) for this useful outcome measure exists.

Data were used from nine trials enrolling a wide spectrum of COPD patients with 6MWD at baseline and follow-up and used to determine threshold values for important changes in 6MWD using three distribution-based methods. Anchor-based methods to determine a MID were also evaluated.

Data were included of 460 COPD patients with a mean±SD forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 39.2±14.1% predicted and 6MWD of 361±112 m at baseline. Threshold values for important effects in 6MWD were between 29 and 42 m, respectively, using the empirical rule effect size and the standardised response mean. The threshold value was 35 m (95% confidence interval 30–42 m) based on the standard error of measurement. Correlations of 6MWD with patient-reported anchors were too low to provide meaningful MID estimates.

6-min walk distance should change by ~35 m for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in order to represent an important effect. This corresponds to a 10% change of baseline 6-min walk distance. The low correlations of 6-min walk distance with patient-reported anchors question whether a minimal important difference exists for the 6-min walk distance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
G. H Markovitz and C. B Cooper
Review series: Rehabilitation in non COPD: Mechanisms of exercise limitation and pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with pulmonary fibrosis/restrictive lung disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease, February 1, 2010; 7(1): 47 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G. Moullec and G. Ninot
An integrated programme after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effect on emotional and functional dimensions of quality of life
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2010; 24(2): 122 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. U. Jette, M. C. Bourgeois, and R. Buchbinder
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Following Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2010; 90(1): 9 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
A. Bourdin, P-R Burgel, P. Chanez, G. Garcia, T. Perez, and N. Roche
Recent advances in COPD: pathophysiology, respiratory physiology and clinical aspects, including comorbidities
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2009; 18(114): 198 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. F. Dummer, M. J. Epton, J. O. Cowan, J. M. Cook, R. Condliffe, C. E. Landhuis, A. D. Smith, and D. R. Taylor
Predicting Corticosteroid Response in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Exhaled Nitric Oxide
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2009; 180(9): 846 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. A. Puhan and H. J. Schunemann
How to increase the value of randomised trials in COPD research
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2009; 34(3): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. J. H. Sillen, C. M. Speksnijder, R.-M. A. Eterman, P. P. Janssen, S. S. Wagers, E. F. M. Wouters, N. H. M. K. Uszko-Lencer, and M. A. Spruit
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of Muscles of Ambulation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure or COPD: A Systematic Review of the English-Language Literature
Chest, July 1, 2009; 136(1): 44 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. H. Salzman
The 6-Min Walk Test: Clinical and Research Role, Technique, Coding, and Reimbursement
Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1345 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.